Republicans in Georgia took a beating Tuesday night. There’s really no other way to describe it. And while I’m disappointed with the outcome, I can’t say I’m entirely surprised.
What troubles me is that much of our Republican leadership apparently was.
I’ve been looking at the numbers, comparing Tuesday’s results with the 2024 presidential election and the 2022 governor’s race. They tell an interesting story, one that I believe Republican leaders would be wise to study before they start assigning blame.
In 2024, Donald Trump carried Georgia by approximately 115,000 votes. Two years later, Democrat Keisha Lance Bottoms defeated Republican Rick Jackson by roughly 360,000 votes. Across much of the statewide ballot, Democrats enjoyed margins approaching half a million votes.
Now consider the 2022 governor’s race, when Brian Kemp defeated Stacey Abrams by nearly 300,000 votes. Comparing those two gubernatorial elections reveals a shift of more than 650,000 votes in the margin between Republicans and Democrats.
That’s an extraordinary change in four years.
Does that mean 650,000 Georgians suddenly abandoned the Republican Party? Of course not. Some changed their votes, some stayed home, and others entered the electorate. We can’t determine exactly what happened simply by looking at the totals.
But I have a theory.
For years, I’ve believed that the people who ultimately determine election outcomes aren’t necessarily the most passionate Republicans or Democrats. They’re the voters somewhere in the middle, people who don’t feel obligated to support a political party simply because they supported it in the past.
They may be conservative on fiscal issues, moderate on social issues, concerned about education, or simply tired of the constant political fighting. They aren’t necessarily looking for ideological purity. They want competent government, responsible leadership, and some indication that the people they’ve elected are actually listening.
And when they become sufficiently frustrated, they’ll either vote for someone else or stay home.
I suspect we witnessed a considerable amount of both Tuesday night.
Georgia Republicans have controlled state government for more than two decades. During that time, we’ve enjoyed considerable economic success, maintained a competitive business environment, and attracted significant investment. Those accomplishments shouldn’t be dismissed.
But neither should they become an excuse for complacency.
In my opinion, Republican leadership in Georgia has become far too comfortable. There has been an assumption that because Georgia is fundamentally conservative, Republicans can continue winning statewide elections without seriously reconsidering their message, their priorities, or the public’s growing frustration.
I believe that assumption caught up with them Tuesday.
To be fair, there’s another factor that probably overshadowed anything Georgia Republicans could have done differently.
Donald Trump.
I recognize that many conservatives, myself included, agree with portions of Trump’s policy agenda. But agreeing with certain policies doesn’t require us to ignore the political consequences of his approach to governing.
His policies, his constant confrontations, and particularly his ego have become so intertwined with the Republican Party that state and local candidates can hardly escape their influence.
You can support border security, lower taxes, and a strong national defense without appreciating the daily political turmoil that seems to accompany this administration.
I suspect there are plenty of Georgians who feel exactly that way.
At some point, the personality becomes bigger than the policy. And when that happens, even voters who generally agree with your political philosophy may decide they’ve simply had enough.
That doesn’t mean Trump alone caused Tuesday’s results. But I believe his influence on the national political environment far eclipsed whatever Georgia’s Republican leadership might have done to prevent these losses.
Still, that doesn’t let our state leaders off the hook.
They should have recognized the warning signs, understood the changing electorate, and done more to establish an identity that extended beyond the national Republican brand. Instead, too many appeared content to assume that what worked in previous elections would continue working.
It didn’t.
Now Georgia faces an entirely different political landscape.
With a Democratic governor, a House of Representatives apparently headed toward Democratic control, and a narrowly Republican-controlled Senate, governing will become considerably more complicated. The final House numbers remain subject to certification, but the direction of the election is clear.
Having served in the Georgia Senate, I know how important relationships and trust become when neither party can simply move legislation through the process on its own.
For years, Republicans have largely controlled the legislative agenda. That is about to change.
Governor-elect Bottoms will have her priorities. Democrats in the House will have theirs. Republicans in the Senate will retain considerable power to influence, modify, or stop legislation.
Healthcare, education, taxes, economic development, and the state budget will all become areas of potentially significant disagreement.
Medicaid expansion alone could consume an enormous amount of political energy. And while there are reasonable arguments on both sides, those arguments won’t mean much if legislators become more interested in political victories than finding workable solutions.
My concern is particularly strong for rural Georgia.
In Northeast Georgia, our communities depend on productive relationships with state government. Transportation improvements, water infrastructure, rural healthcare, education, and economic development aren’t partisan talking points. They’re the things that determine whether our communities grow and prosper.
I’ve worked on enough of these issues to know that getting things done often requires cooperation among people who don’t agree on much of anything politically.
A company considering locating in Habersham County doesn’t care who won the latest argument at the Capitol. It wants infrastructure, a qualified workforce, reasonable taxes, and confidence that government can deliver on its commitments.
Political gridlock won’t help us accomplish any of that.
There is an opportunity here, however, if our elected leaders are willing to recognize it.
Divided government can force people to work together. Sometimes that’s not a bad thing. It requires compromise, a willingness to listen, and an understanding that having a different political opinion doesn’t necessarily make someone your enemy.
I’ve seen firsthand that good legislation often emerges from difficult conversations between people who disagree.
Whether that happens over the next two years will depend entirely on the people we’ve elected.
As for Republicans, I hope Tuesday’s election leads to some serious reflection.
Blaming the media, the consultants, the candidates, or the turnout operation might make some people feel better. But none of that addresses the larger problem.
Republicans need to understand why so many voters who were willing to support the party just two years ago were unwilling to do so Tuesday.
And Democrats shouldn’t become overly confident either. Georgia hasn’t necessarily undergone some permanent ideological transformation. Many of the same voters who supported Republicans in 2024 helped produce Tuesday’s Democratic victories. Their support isn’t guaranteed to either party.
That’s the point I’ve been trying to make.
The political middle matters. Maybe more than we’ve been willing to admit.
You don’t necessarily win those voters by being louder, angrier, or more confrontational. You win their confidence by demonstrating sound judgment, providing steady leadership, and producing results.
I remain a conservative. My political beliefs haven’t changed because Republicans lost an election. But I also believe conservatism should stand for more than defending every action or statement made by someone who happens to have an R beside his name.
Georgia Republicans have some difficult questions to answer, and I hope they’re willing to ask them.
Meanwhile, Democrats now have an enormous responsibility to govern a state where millions of people don’t necessarily agree with their political philosophy.
The voters have spoken. January will bring a new governor, a different political balance, and some very real challenges.
And those voters in the middle?
I suspect they’ll be watching very closely.